Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 15:53

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why are people with Asperger syndrome unenthusiastic?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Athletics' Denzel Clarke leaps over wall to rob Angels' HR for incredible catch - ESPN
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Anthropologists map Neanderthals' long and winding roads across Europe and Eurasia - Phys.org
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Redefining physics to roll a ball vertically - Phys.org
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
A new type of X-point radiator that prevents tokamaks from overheating - Phys.org
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
NJ electric bills are about to jump 20% — who's to blame and what can you do? - Gothamist
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
What caused the decline of the Soprano crew?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.